Aug 25th, 2022 Upcoming Hardware Launches 2022 (Updated Aug 2022).Aug 30th, 2022 SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Review - The King of Gaming Headsets.Aug 19th, 2022 Gigabyte X570S AERO G Review.Aug 16th, 2022 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-6600 C元2 2x 16 GB Review.Aug 15th, 2022 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered: DLAA vs.Aug 8th, 2022 ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme Glacial Review.The mouse also sells at a competitive price point, the $50 putting it in the same price range as a Nixeus Revel. So while there are minor points of criticism from my side, I still like the mouse. After doing it once, it's also very intuitive, and I had no trouble setting the three profiles up to my liking. Granted, optional software for settings is never bad, but a system like this that allows you to change settings on the fly without the need to install anything is very nice. What I really have to praise Ninox for is the nice option to configure the mouse without any software. To me, this is a minor issue for a gaming mouse, but I also rarely use the wheel in games, so if the wheel is a vital part of the mouse for you, I'd recommend using another mouse. It also causes some noise when making fast directional turns with the mouse.
I've seen the same encoder used to much better effect. My main point of criticism is the wheel because it feels absolutely unsatisfying to use in spite of the mechanical encoder Ninox used. With the surface and the texture used, I can get a safe grip at all times, both with dry and more moist hands. The main buttons could use some improvements, but at the same time, it was never an issue in games. The sensor performs perfectly tracking is fine on all gaming surfaces I tested it on. It's a no gimmicks, light weight, high-performance mouse made with arena shooter players in mind, and it works really well for me when I use it in those games. Intel GPU Business in a $3.To me, the Ninox Venator delivers on the promise Ninox made with their first model, the Aurora.Intel Arc Board Partners are Reportedly Stopping Production, Encountering Quality Issues.AMD Announces Ryzen 7000 Series "Zen 4" Desktop Processors.Sep 2nd, 2022 Channel Well Technology CSX 850M-G Review - The first PCIe 5.0 ready SFX PSU.Aug 11th, 2022 Edifier STAX SPIRIT S3 Planar Magnetic Wireless Headphones Review.Aug 25th, 2022 be quiet! Pure Rock 2 FX Review.
Still, there were no tracking problems at all, which is very good in my books. Lift off distanceThe Venator has less than one disc of LOD, which is definitely low. In this test, the angular displacements were 1.3, 0.23, 1.56, 0.84, 0.19, -0.27, -0.42, -0.72, which is actually a very good result and as expected for a 3360 sensor. I have done this same test with a variety of different mice and sensors, so it's possible to compare. There is obviously some degree of error here due to me performing this test manually because I lack a test bench that is able to limit movement to the x-axis only. After every swipe back to my starting position, I record the deviation from the starting position. With a script, I set my viewing angle to 0 0 0 at the start. The second row shows the viewing angle, of which my point of reference is mainly the second one, the x-axis angle. In the top-right corner is the showpos command in the Source engine. You can see me move the mouse at varying speeds from a starting position and back again at a different speed. With this test, I show how accurately the sensor reports movement at different speeds. So here, everything looks perfectly fine. As you can see, the CPI steps are all a bit above their proclaimed values however, they are very consistent in that you get used to it quickly anyway.
0 kommentar(er)
